25.23°C

All Stories

Mining firms to face penalties over illegal activity on concessions – EPA

The Environmental Protection Authority has issued a strong directive to mining companies across Ghana, warning that firms will face severe regulatory sanctions if they fail to prevent illegal mining activities within their concessions.

In a press statement released on Thursday, April 23, the Authority reaffirmed its legal powers under the Environmental Protection Act, 2025, and the Environmental Protection (Environmental Assessment) Regulations, 2025. It stressed that all licensed operators are legally obligated to protect the environmental integrity of their concession areas.

The EPA expressed growing concern over the increasing incidence of illegal mining—commonly known as “galamsey”—occurring within legally granted mining concessions. According to the Authority, this trend is significantly contributing to environmental degradation across the country.

Among the key impacts highlighted are the pollution of rivers and other water bodies, the destruction of forest reserves, and widespread land degradation. The EPA warned that these environmental harms are undermining national conservation efforts as well as the lawful operations of licensed mining companies.

In response to the situation, the Authority outlined a series of compulsory measures that all mining companies must implement without delay. These include strengthening security within concession areas to prevent illegal encroachment and establishing robust surveillance and monitoring systems.

Companies have also been instructed to promptly report all unauthorized mining activities to relevant state security and regulatory agencies. In addition, operators must strictly comply with all conditions attached to their environmental permits, including approved Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) and Environmental Management Plans.

The EPA emphasized that preventing pollution and environmental degradation within operational zones remains a core legal obligation for all licensed firms.

The Authority warned that any failure to adequately protect concessions or control illegal mining activities will be treated as a breach of permit conditions. Citing provisions under the Environmental Protection Act, 2025, the EPA indicated it is prepared to take firm enforcement action against non-compliant companies.

Sanctions may include suspension or outright revocation of environmental permits, imposition of administrative fines, and coordinated enforcement operations in collaboration with state security agencies.

The EPA said this tougher stance reflects a broader shift toward stricter environmental governance as Ghana intensifies efforts to combat illegal mining and its associated environmental damage.

As part of its enforcement strategy, the EPA announced plans to conduct a nationwide compliance monitoring exercise across all mining concessions. The exercise is scheduled to begin on May 10, 2026, and will assess whether mining companies are fully adhering to environmental regulations and permit conditions.

Mining firms have been urged to take immediate steps to ensure full compliance ahead of the inspections, which the Authority described as comprehensive in scope.

The EPA reiterated its commitment to enforcing environmental laws and protecting the country’s natural resources. It also called on mining companies to act responsibly and support national efforts to curb illegal mining.

“The Environmental Protection Authority remains committed to the strict enforcement of environmental laws and calls on all mining companies to uphold responsible environmental stewardship in support of national efforts to combat illegal mining,” the statement concluded.

Mining firms to face penalties over illegal activity on concessions – EPA

Gov’t directs Newmont, AngloGold, Zijin to shift mining ops to local firms by December – Sources

The Minerals Commission of Ghana has issued a firm directive to major international mining companies, including Newmont, AngloGold Ashanti, and Chinese-owned Zijin Mining Group, requiring them to transition their mining operations to local contractors by December 2026 or face possible sanctions. This development was confirmed by five sources with direct knowledge of the matter, as well as supporting documents reviewed by Reuters.

Gov’t directs Newmont, AngloGold, Zijin to shift mining ops to local firms by December – Sources

New NPA bill proposes $80 LPG levy to fund cylinder recirculation

A new National Petroleum Authority (NPA) Bill, yet to be laid before Parliament, is expected to introduce major reforms to petroleum pricing and funding structures, including the introduction of an $80 levy on every metric tonne of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) to finance Ghana’s Cylinder Recirculation Model.

New NPA bill proposes $80 LPG levy to fund cylinder recirculation

Stakeholders were not consulted before Publican AI rollout at ports – GUTA

The Ghana Union of Traders’ Associations has expressed concern over the introduction of an artificial intelligence system at the country’s ports, saying key stakeholders were not adequately consulted before its rollout. The development has sparked debate within Ghana’s trading community about transparency, stakeholder engagement, and the potential economic impact of emerging technologies in trade facilitation.

Stakeholders were not consulted before Publican AI rollout at ports – GUTA

Government’s fuel relief avoids immediate revenue hit but puts OMCs under pressure

Government’s recent fuel relief intervention is proving to be more nuanced than initially perceived, with a policy design that deliberately avoids cutting taxes while redistributing financial pressure within the petroleum sector.

On April 15, 2026, the Presidency announced that Ghana would absorb GH¢2.00 per litre on diesel and 36 pesewas per litre on petrol for an initial four-week period starting April 16. The move was introduced in response to rising global crude oil prices linked to geopolitical tensions involving the United States, Israel, and Iran. A policy review is expected after May 16.

Contrary to public expectations, the government did not reduce fuel taxes and levies. Instead, it targeted margins within the downstream petroleum pricing structure—a distinction with significant fiscal implications.

Fuel pricing in Ghana typically includes about GH¢4.20 per litre in combined taxes and margins:

  • Approximately GH¢2.90 represents taxes that go directly into government revenue
  • Around GH¢1.37 consists of margins allocated to sector institutions

These margins fund operations of agencies such as:

  • Bulk Oil Storage and Transportation Company (BOST)
  • National Petroleum Authority (NPA)
  • Petroleum Hub Development Corporation

They also support mechanisms like the Unified Petroleum Pricing Fund (UPPF), which stabilises fuel prices across regions.

By cutting margins instead of taxes, the government has preserved its revenue stream—avoiding the need to cut spending, raise alternative revenues, or later reintroduce taxes, a scenario previously seen during the COVID-19 levy era.

The structure of the intervention differs between petrol and diesel:

Petrol

  • Margins reduced moderately
  • Pump price lowered by 36 pesewas per litre
  • UPPF remains positive at about 66 pesewas per litre, meaning distribution costs are still covered

Diesel

  • Full margin of about GH¢1.37 removed
  • Additional support pushes total relief to GH¢2.00 per litre
  • UPPF turns negative (around –63 pesewas per litre)

This negative UPPF introduces a key shift:
Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs) must now pre-finance fuel distribution costs, with reimbursement expected later through the NPA.

This arrangement creates a timing gap in the system. OMCs will absorb upfront logistics costs for several weeks—possibly longer—before recovering funds.

The expectation is that once margins are restored, excess inflows into the UPPF will be used to settle these obligations. However, any delay in reimbursement could create liquidity constraints and affect supply chain stability.

Meanwhile, state institutions that rely on margins face reduced inflows. Agencies such as BOST, NPA, and the Petroleum Hub Development Corporation may experience:

  • Tighter operational budgets
  • Delayed projects or reduced spending capacity
  • Increased financial strain on off-budget commitments

Estimates suggest that the margin cuts could result in about GH¢550 million in foregone inflows across the petroleum value chain within a month.

The policy reflects a deliberate trade-off:

  • Government position: Revenue remains protected in the short term
  • Sector impact: Financial pressure shifts to downstream institutions and OMCs

Rather than creating an immediate fiscal deficit, the government has effectively redistributed the burden within the petroleum ecosystem.

This approach may be strategic. A temporary liquidity squeeze within sector institutions is generally easier to reverse than a structural gap in the national budget.

The policy also raises broader questions about efficiency within the system.

For petrol, where the UPPF remains positive, it suggests that fuel distribution may be sustainable at lower cost levels than previously assumed. This could prompt further scrutiny of pricing structures and margin allocations in the future.

However, the sustainability of the current relief remains uncertain.

If extended beyond the initial four-week period:

  • Pressure on OMCs will intensify
  • Reimbursement obligations will grow
  • Financial strain on sector agencies could deepen

Timely settlements and careful monitoring will be critical to preventing disruptions in fuel supply.

For now, the government has successfully insulated its fiscal position while delivering short-term relief to consumers at the pump.

But the cost has not disappeared—it has been shifted downstream, where OMCs face liquidity challenges and state agencies operate with reduced financial buffers.

The coming weeks will determine whether this balancing act can be maintained or whether adjustments will be needed to sustain both fuel affordability and sector stability.

Government’s fuel relief avoids immediate revenue hit but puts OMCs under pressure
Please fill the required field.
Image

Download Our Mobile App

Image
Image